Jun 20, 2023 22:31
1 yr ago
13 viewers *
Swedish term
Canada
For SV-EN translation you can trust
Native in: English (Variant: Canadian) 
Works in: Swedish to English
förklaringsmisstag
Swedish to English
Law/Patents
Law: Contract(s)
In a contract, one party is entitle to unilaterally make changes in reference to bla, bla, bla, and "uppenbara skrivfel och andra förklaringsmisstag." I get a few hits for "mistakes of explanation" - surely it should be "errors of explanation"? - but is that a thing in English contract law? Legal eagles, your thoughts, please.
Proposed translations
(English)
| 4 | mistake in expression |
Sam Habach
|
| 5 -1 | mistake in declaration of intent |
Paul Lambert
|
| 3 -2 | UK: (contractual or crim.) misrepresentation: (negligent) mis-statement (in the law of tort) |
Adrian MM.
|
Proposed translations
2 hrs
Sam Habach
United States
United States
Native in English
Specializes in field
United States
High quality, flexibility, fast delivery
Native in: English
Works in: Swedish to English, German to English, Norwegian to English, and 3 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
4
Selected
mistake in expression
It usually refers to situations in which there is a flaw or mistake in the way something is described or articulated in a legal agreement. This can include situations in which a contract provision contains incorrect or ambiguous wording or phrasing, resulting in a misunderstanding or incorrect interpretation of the intended meaning.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thanks everyone for your answers!"
-1
2 hrs
Paul Lambert
Sweden
Sweden
Native in English
Works in field
Sweden
Always on time
Native in: English
Works in: Swedish to English, Norwegian to English, Danish to English
Related KudoZ points
:
20
mistake in declaration of intent
Mistake made by the offeror in a contract, such as saying or writing "three" and meaning "thirty". He will usually be bound by this mistake if the offeree relies on it in good faith and does not suspect it is wrong; however, he will not be bound by it if the offeree knows or should have known that it was indeed a mistake.
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
Adrian MM.
: a high confidence level, neither with any refs., nor any tie-up with any specialist contract or tortious term of art in Anglo-Can. law, such as a 'nevertheless binding / irrevocable' *fraudulent (mis-) representation*.
2 days 11 hrs
|
-2
14 hrs
Adrian MM.
Austria
Austria
Native in English
Specializes in field
Austria
Retd.T&I, Barrister & Austro-Advokat
Native in: English (Variants: British, Scottish) 
Works in: Spanish to English, English to Spanish, French to English, and 5 more.
Related KudoZ points
:
8
UK: (contractual or crim.) misrepresentation: (negligent) mis-statement (in the law of tort)
I'm unsure if Canadian law has the same catrgories. - hence or ergo, middle-level confidence.
Dolusregeln och förklaringsmisstag
Dolusregeln
Förklaringsmisstag
Felskrivning, felräkning Rekvisit:
Misstaget ska föreligga på den rättshandlandes sida
Följden av misstaget ska vara att rättshandlingen fått ett annat innehåll än åsyftat
Motparten ska ha varit i ond tro
Dolusregeln och förklaringsmisstag
Dolusregeln
Förklaringsmisstag
Felskrivning, felräkning Rekvisit:
Misstaget ska föreligga på den rättshandlandes sida
Följden av misstaget ska vara att rättshandlingen fått ett annat innehåll än åsyftat
Motparten ska ha varit i ond tro
Example sentence:
Regeln om förklaringsmisstag ger uttryck för en princip som kallas för tillitsprincipen. Tillitsprincipen går ut på att en avtalspart som är i god tro skall skyddas.
Din motpart åberopar vad som inom avtalsrätten brukar kallas för förklaringsmisstag, vilket är en ogiltighetsgrund som regleras i 32 § 1 st. AvtL.
Peer comment(s):
| disagree |
Paul Lambert
: From what I gather, this is not that harsh nor lays blame or liability. It simply means that an offerer is bound to the mistaken terms if the offeree accepted them in good faith, and is not if the offeree realises that this is a mistake.
4 hrs
|
|
a high confidence level, neither with any refs., nor any tie-up with any specialist contract or tortious term of art in Anglo-Can. law, such as a 'nevertheless binding / irrevocable' *fraudulent (mis-) representation*.
|
|
| disagree |
Christopher Schröder
: What Paul said. It’s E&O. /// No routine opposition. You just give wrong answers sometimes.
19 hrs
|
|
You, who ostensibly have never studied the law of contract or tort of any legal system, have also - with a mind of your own - still learned something in your routine opposition.
|
Discussion