Dec 13, 2005 09:02
18 yrs ago
English term
逻辑问题
English to Chinese
Tech/Engineering
Business/Commerce (general)
outsource
Q Is outsourcing a real trend or a fad?
A CH: It definitely is a real trend. We’ve all seen the growth of outsourcing in the functional areas of a bank, for example, in human resources, IT, finance processing and so on. The growth going forward is in the area of operational outsourcing and more of the “core” activities of a financial institution as opposed to these traditional service or functional areas.
A CK: Supporting the fact that this is an integral part of the way banks do business is that some banks find themselves sub-scale in terms of processing volumes. To stay competitive they have to invest in infrastructure that does not support an economic business case.
最后一句合乎逻辑吗?
A CH: It definitely is a real trend. We’ve all seen the growth of outsourcing in the functional areas of a bank, for example, in human resources, IT, finance processing and so on. The growth going forward is in the area of operational outsourcing and more of the “core” activities of a financial institution as opposed to these traditional service or functional areas.
A CK: Supporting the fact that this is an integral part of the way banks do business is that some banks find themselves sub-scale in terms of processing volumes. To stay competitive they have to invest in infrastructure that does not support an economic business case.
最后一句合乎逻辑吗?
Proposed translations
(Chinese)
4 | FYI |
Jianjun Zhang
![]() |
3 | See below for explanation |
chenarth
![]() |
Proposed translations
21 hrs
English term (edited):
������
Selected
FYI
To stay competitive they have to invest in infrastructure that does not support an economic business case.
说话的人似乎随口讲出来,也顾不得精雕细琢。不过可以理解他的意思:
要保持竞争力,这些公司对原本支持不好的基础设施投入资金建设,改善竞争情况。
说话的人似乎随口讲出来,也顾不得精雕细琢。不过可以理解他的意思:
要保持竞争力,这些公司对原本支持不好的基础设施投入资金建设,改善竞争情况。
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "谢谢!"
5 hrs
English term (edited):
������
See below for explanation
Read the last sentence "To stay competitive they have to invest in infrastructure that does not support A SINGLE economic business case." Does it make better sense now?
Something went wrong...