Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
Æneas
English answer:
Aeneas, same name
English term
Æneas
Is Æneas the same as Aeneas?
5 +15 | yes the same | Stephanie Ezrol |
Jan 20, 2010 14:41: Stephanie Ezrol Created KOG entry
Feb 5, 2010 03:12: Stephanie Ezrol changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/1092290">Stephanie Ezrol's</a> old entry - " Æneas"" to ""Aeneas, same name""
Feb 7, 2010 13:14: Stephanie Ezrol changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/1092290">Stephanie Ezrol's</a> old entry - " Æneas"" to ""Aeneas, same name""
Feb 7, 2010 13:16: Stephanie Ezrol changed "Edited KOG entry" from "<a href="/profile/1092290">Stephanie Ezrol's</a> old entry - " Æneas"" to ""Aeneas, same name""
Non-PRO (2): Edith Kelly, Polangmar
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
yes the same
agree |
Henry Schroeder
1 min
|
Thanks
|
|
agree |
Jenni Lukac (X)
2 mins
|
Thanks
|
|
agree |
Françoise Vogel
5 mins
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
John Detre
14 mins
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
Jack Doughty
15 mins
|
Thanks
|
|
agree |
Carol Gullidge
29 mins
|
Thanks
|
|
agree |
Alexandra Taggart
29 mins
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
Filippe Vasconcellos de Freitas Guimarães
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Æ
45 mins
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
Jim Tucker (X)
: It's actually the same way of spelling it, using a ligature (the "ash") for the diphthong.
47 mins
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
Thayenga
56 mins
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
MarinaM
1 hr
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
Rolf Keiser
2 hrs
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
Sabina Moscatelli
3 hrs
|
Thanks.
|
|
agree |
Mark Nathan
: except I don't think Neptune was Aeneas's father.
5 hrs
|
Hubbard is always so tongue in cheek in his writing it's hard to tell what he thought
|
|
agree |
Dylan Edwards
: Yes, it's a different spelling of the same name, but I query the whole thing. I think it should be Ancaeus, not Aeneas.
21 hrs
|
Discussion
What I would query is whether it should be Æneas at all. Various sources mention ANCAEUS as a son of the sea god Neptune (or in Greek, Poseidon) and/or an ancestor of Pythagoras.
Is Hubbard trying to confuse us?