| Pages in topic: [1 2] > | Allergic to confidence level 5 Thread poster: Kim Metzger
|
|---|
Dear ProZians - I'd like to know how you feel about commenting on a person's confidence level in peer comments. I mainly visit the German/English KudoZ pairs, where the use of confidence level 5 is generally frowned on by the community, and it is practically standard practice for members/users to let others know how they feel about excessive confidence. Occasionally, we get visitors from other language pairs, Spanish/Portuguese/English for example, where CL 5 (Highest - I am sure) appears to be ... See more Dear ProZians - I'd like to know how you feel about commenting on a person's confidence level in peer comments. I mainly visit the German/English KudoZ pairs, where the use of confidence level 5 is generally frowned on by the community, and it is practically standard practice for members/users to let others know how they feel about excessive confidence. Occasionally, we get visitors from other language pairs, Spanish/Portuguese/English for example, where CL 5 (Highest - I am sure) appears to be quite common and when they enter an answer in our language pairs with CL 5, members/users tend to comment on their choice by entering a neutral comment regarding their confidence level – kind of as a way to try to maintain a healthy community of linguists and preserve the integrity of the language pair.
I have been informed that a neutral peer comment to the effect of "I'm allergic to confidence level 5" is in violation of rule 3.5.
3.5 Peer comments must be purely linguistic. As elsewhere in the site, personal comments are not allowed in peer comments. Notes should be based solely on linguistic evaluation of answers provided. Backing up peer comments with references is encouraged.
I understand that such comments are indeed not purely linguistic, but when the CL was introduced, it was for the purpose of protecting askers from charlatans and confidence tricksters who are not afraid to deliberately mislead the asker and who may be eager to get their answers at the top of the list. In short, it was introduced to add a measure of integrity to the process and prevent askers from being misled. That's also the purpose of the "disagree."
Question: do you think neutral comments on a person's confidence level should be prohibited? ▲ Collapse
| | | | PAS 
Local time: 12:11
Polish to English
+ ...
| Question and comment | Sep 1, 2008 |
No, a neutral should not be prohibited, provided I have reasonable grounds to contest the answer.
But I think that 5 levels is too many. Three or four would be sufficient (wild guess, reasonably sure, dead sure).
I mean, after all, if I answer a question like "I love you", "E flat major" or "equilateral triangle", why shouldn't I dial the maximum confidence level?
Pawel Skalinski
| | | | | Peer comments based on linguistic evaluation | Sep 1, 2008 |
Hello Kim,
As you mention, this type of comment is not purely linguistic. Confidence level represents how certain the answerer feels that their answer is the most helpful. KudoZ rule http://www.proz.com/siterules/kudoz_answ/3.7#3.7 would also apply in this case.
Best regards,
Jared
| | | | Kevin Fulton
United States
Local time: 06:11
German to English
| Level 5 confidence not always appropriate | Sep 1, 2008 |
Kim Metzger wrote:
Question: do you think neutral comments on a person's confidence level should be prohibited?
I don't see anything wrong with neutral comments on a confidence rating. Each Kudoz section seems to have its own style of answering, and as you point out, a 5 confidence level in the German>English section is a rarity among regular contributors. Apparently some people feel that if a translation can be found in a dictionary, then it must be 100% correct -- and appropriate -- in all contexts, hence the "5" confidence level. I'm very leery of level 5 confidence shown by people working outside their language pairs.
| | |
|
|
|
| Allergic to the disagreeZ... | Sep 1, 2008 |
No, I don't think so...
Most of the time, I use a confidence level 3...
But I also think the best way to "comment" on other people's answers is to use the "agree" bit or well...answer and justify your answer... As you are allergic to confidence level 5, I am allergic to the disagrees and I'm not sure I would feel better if they were pink, purple or yellow...Neutral comments tend to be regarded as disagrees I'm afraid, although they can be pretty useful in some cases. Probably the rea... See more No, I don't think so...
Most of the time, I use a confidence level 3...
But I also think the best way to "comment" on other people's answers is to use the "agree" bit or well...answer and justify your answer... As you are allergic to confidence level 5, I am allergic to the disagrees and I'm not sure I would feel better if they were pink, purple or yellow...Neutral comments tend to be regarded as disagrees I'm afraid, although they can be pretty useful in some cases. Probably the reason why you've been told off...I mean...Informed...
My peer comments are almost never exclusively linguistic...I just like a human, chatty extra...And I would HATE being "informed" not to do that...
Kindest regards, ▲ Collapse
| | | | | "Hypersensitive" might be a better term | Sep 1, 2008 |
Hi Kim, I know absolutely what you mean. However, please look at it from a pure linguistic point of view as described in rule 3.5
3.5 .....Notes should be based solely on linguistic evaluation of answers provided.
I do understand, that a more medical description
Kim Metzger wrote:
"I'm allergic to confidence level 5"
gives the Levites a reason "dir die Leviten zu lesen" as we say in German "
A more neutral statement such as
You entered a confidence level of 5. I am sure you are aware of Rule 3.1 (.......Occasional guessing of translations is acceptable; guessing systematically is not allowed). Unfortunatly based on my knowledge and experience I cannot confirm this confidence level..
might be a better option.
You are just stating a fact,
You entered a confidence level of 5.
quoting a Proz rule,
Rule 3.1 (......Occasional guessing of translations is acceptable; guessing systematically is not allowed).
and acknowledging that your experience and knowledge does not allow you to confirm this confidence level
Unfortunatly, based on my knowledge and experience I cannot confirm this confidence level
I do not see any reason why such a statement should not be allowed, since you are not making any comment on the answerer / his/her experience etc as described in Rule 3.7:
Comments or insinuations concerning an answerer's or asker's experience or profile, his/her decision to post a certain question or answer, grade or close a question in a certain way, make a certain glossary entry, etc., are strictly prohibited
To answer your question, NO I do not think that neutral comments on a person's confidence level should be prohibited. But this is a field were we both might need to learn to comply with PROZs political correctness guidelines.
| | | | Ken Cox
Local time: 12:11
German to English
+ ...
OK, a comment such as 'I'm allergic to CL 5' is not a linguist comment, no argument there.
However, the CL selected by an answerer is ultimately a subjective judgement and prone to misuse or abuse. After all, who's to say that the answerer isn't fully confident of the correctness of the proposed answer, no matter how questionable it may be? It would be nice if we were all perfectly objective and honest and all had the same understanding of the nuances of the confidence levels, but r... See more OK, a comment such as 'I'm allergic to CL 5' is not a linguist comment, no argument there.
However, the CL selected by an answerer is ultimately a subjective judgement and prone to misuse or abuse. After all, who's to say that the answerer isn't fully confident of the correctness of the proposed answer, no matter how questionable it may be? It would be nice if we were all perfectly objective and honest and all had the same understanding of the nuances of the confidence levels, but real life is different.
Unfortunately, 'subjective' peer comments are discouraged or prohibited unless they qualify as lingusitic comments, which means that the only 'linguistic' way to challenge the stated CL of an answer is to demonstrate that the answer is wrong by providing an alternate answer that is evidently better -- an indirect and time-consuming process.
Perhaps the best response to a perceived unwarranted use of CL5 is a disagree with the simple comment 'I don't think the CL is justified by the explanation', especially when answerers provide no substantiation or dubious substantiation. That's 'linguistically' neutral, and IMHO fair: it's your opinion versus mine. If peers can't say 'I don't think so', what defense is there for the right of the answerer to say 'look no further, this is the right answer', which is what CL5 usually communicates?
Further comment: I generally agree with Siegfried's comments (which were not visible when I posted my reply), although I don't think we should start throwing rules at each other (leave that to the moderators).
[Edited at 2008-09-01 21:35] ▲ Collapse
| | | | Kim Metzger
Mexico
Local time: 04:11
German to English
TOPIC STARTER | Grade inflation | Sep 1, 2008 |
As I said, the German/English communities do a pretty good job of keeping the CL under control. The problem arises mainly when we are visited by members/users who usually frequent other language pairs where the high 5 is almost the default selection.
I think the Spanish/English community is suffering from grade inflation. I just took another look at the CLs in pro-level Spanish to English and it seems that almost no one uses anything other than 5. A CL 5 is practically the default s... See more As I said, the German/English communities do a pretty good job of keeping the CL under control. The problem arises mainly when we are visited by members/users who usually frequent other language pairs where the high 5 is almost the default selection.
I think the Spanish/English community is suffering from grade inflation. I just took another look at the CLs in pro-level Spanish to English and it seems that almost no one uses anything other than 5. A CL 5 is practically the default selection. If you enter a 4 you'll be at the bottom of the list and it will take a lot of "agrees" to move to the top.
Are all these pro-level questions so easy that there can be no doubt about the best answer? If so, why do we also commonly see four or five different answers? Everybody is "Highest, I am sure"? What's wrong with a high 4 if you're not just guessing? Back up your answer with a good explanation and some solid references where appropriate, and let the chips fall where they may. Or maybe no one trusts askers to be smart enough to assess answers in that language pair if the answerer isn't absolutely positive and they have created a monster.
It's almost as though if you don't select 5, your answer will be considered a guess. ▲ Collapse
| | |
|
|
|
savaria (X)
Hungary
Local time: 12:11
English to Hungarian
+ ...
| I think nobody should use confidence level 5(five)... | Sep 1, 2008 |
unless several well-known websites confirm your proposal.
| | | | | or dictionaries | Sep 1, 2008 |
savaria wrote:
unless several well-known websites confirm your proposal.
Or even better several well-known dictionaries...
Cheers
S
| | | | | just an observation | Sep 1, 2008 |
this is not in response to any specific previous post, but just to make an observation or two about the structure of kudoZ
as far as I am concerned, when I make a question that gets quite a few answers, I read very carefully all of them and give as much consideration to those that are at the bottom of the list as to those that are at the top. thus I believe the problem of good answers being pushed to the bottom of the list because of a lower CL is not really a big deal.
... See more this is not in response to any specific previous post, but just to make an observation or two about the structure of kudoZ
as far as I am concerned, when I make a question that gets quite a few answers, I read very carefully all of them and give as much consideration to those that are at the bottom of the list as to those that are at the top. thus I believe the problem of good answers being pushed to the bottom of the list because of a lower CL is not really a big deal.
generally, moreover, I tend to give less credit to the confidence level, and more credit to whether the answerer a) is a native speaker of the language, and b) is listed as working/specializing in the field.
this is because I know that CL judgements can vary from individual to individual, based on their personality, and while they can be helpful they are not a 100% reliable, or not as reliable as other information on the answerer that are available on the page. ▲ Collapse
| | | | | I had to laugh. | Sep 2, 2008 |
Kim Metzger wrote:
I think the Spanish/English community is suffering from grade inflation. I just took another look at the CLs in pro-level Spanish to English and it seems that almost no one uses anything other than 5. A CL 5 is practically the default selection.
Just the other day I answered a question and realized, too late, that I had accidentally hit a CL of 5 instead of the intended 4. I was so embarrassed that I added a note to apologize!
| | |
|
|
|
RieM
United States
Local time: 06:11
English to Japanese
+ ...
| How about a poll? | Sep 2, 2008 |
Hi,
I just wonder how much CL affects asker's decision-making. As we know, CL is just subjective judgement. Unless it is accompanied by well-founded argument, it has an adverse impact on other participants. An "allergic reaction" is one of the symptoms!
But does asker take CL into account? How much? It seems that it affects other answerers, participants and viewers more than it does askers. I'm curious to... See more Hi,
I just wonder how much CL affects asker's decision-making. As we know, CL is just subjective judgement. Unless it is accompanied by well-founded argument, it has an adverse impact on other participants. An "allergic reaction" is one of the symptoms!
But does asker take CL into account? How much? It seems that it affects other answerers, participants and viewers more than it does askers. I'm curious to know...
Regards,
Rie ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Grade inflation and allergy to disagrees | Sep 2, 2008 |
Kim Metzger wrote:
I think the Spanish/English community is suffering from grade inflation.
Indeed, the English/Spanish community has some problems in that area. There is always someone (or several people) who replies with a confidence 5. Sometimes a user comes by who needs many disagrees to understand that maybe his/her permanent confidence 5 in all possible topics does not reflect the depth of his/her knowledge.
And of course disagrees create big trouble with many Spanish answerers, and even personal attacks and unkind comments over email. I can't quite grasp why, but it is true.
| | | | Vanda Nissen
Australia
Local time: 20:11
Member (2008)
English to Russian
+ ...
Rie Matsuda wrote:
But does asker take CL into account? How much? It seems that it affects other answerers, participants and viewers more than it does askers. I'm curious to know...
Regards,
Rie
Well, sometimes it does because answers with a higher level of confidence tend to appear in front of the ones with a lower level of confidence. I personally think that this rule should be reconsidered. Last week I answered the legal question, and because I found the answer in a very reputable dictionary and checked it on the net afterwards, I chose the 4 th level (ususally I choose 3th), and 10 min later another person, using exactly the same terms just twisting them around, entered the answer but using the 5th level of confidence so his answer appears in front of mine now, and the asker has not made his decision yet, so it would not actually surprise me if the one with the higher CL is going to be preferred.
| | | | | Pages in topic: [1 2] > | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Allergic to confidence level 5 | Protemos translation business management system | Create your account in minutes, and start working! 3-month trial for agencies, and free for freelancers!
The system lets you keep client/vendor database, with contacts and rates, manage projects and assign jobs to vendors, issue invoices, track payments, store and manage project files, generate business reports on turnover profit per client/manager etc.
More info » |
| | Wordfast Pro | Translation Memory Software for Any Platform
Exclusive discount for ProZ.com users!
Save over 13% when purchasing Wordfast Pro through ProZ.com. Wordfast is the world's #1 provider of platform-independent Translation Memory software. Consistently ranked the most user-friendly and highest value
Buy now! » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
