Aug 23, 2006 23:50
18 yrs ago
6 viewers *
English term
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
English to Spanish
Law/Patents
Law (general)
Gracias de antemano por su ayuda.
Proposed translations
(Spanish)
3 +1 | confirmado por una opinión no publicada hecha en nombre de la corte | Claudia Aguero |
Proposed translations
+1
19 mins
Selected
confirmado por una opinión no publicada hecha en nombre de la corte
Quizàs esta definición le pueda ayudar (abajo está la dirección):
LII / Legal Information Institute (Cornell Law School):
A "per curiam" decision is a decision delivered via an opinion issued in the name of the Court rather than specific justices. Most decisions on the merits by the Supreme Court (and other appellate courts in the U.S.) take the form of one or more opinions signed by individual justices (and joined in by others). Even when such signed opinions are unanimous, they are not termed "per curiam." "Per curiam" decisions are given that label by the Court itself and tend to be short. Usually, though not always, they deal with issues the Court views as relatively non-controversial.
For examples, see, e.g., Wood v. Bartholomew, 516 U.S. 1 (1995) and Kimberlin v. Quinlin, 515 U.S. 321(1995). However, they are not necessarily unanimous. Indeed, some per curiam decisions are accompanied by dissenting opinions. See, e.g., Bush v. Gore (http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html), 531 US 98 (2000).
The top appellate courts of most states (including, e.g., Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina) use the same terminology.
LII / Legal Information Institute (Cornell Law School):
A "per curiam" decision is a decision delivered via an opinion issued in the name of the Court rather than specific justices. Most decisions on the merits by the Supreme Court (and other appellate courts in the U.S.) take the form of one or more opinions signed by individual justices (and joined in by others). Even when such signed opinions are unanimous, they are not termed "per curiam." "Per curiam" decisions are given that label by the Court itself and tend to be short. Usually, though not always, they deal with issues the Court views as relatively non-controversial.
For examples, see, e.g., Wood v. Bartholomew, 516 U.S. 1 (1995) and Kimberlin v. Quinlin, 515 U.S. 321(1995). However, they are not necessarily unanimous. Indeed, some per curiam decisions are accompanied by dissenting opinions. See, e.g., Bush v. Gore (http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZPC.html), 531 US 98 (2000).
The top appellate courts of most states (including, e.g., Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Nebraska, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina) use the same terminology.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "¡Muchas gracias!"
Something went wrong...