Sep 18, 2013 09:05
10 yrs ago
1 viewer *
English term

the apparent anomaly

English Social Sciences Linguistics term
The whole sentence like this:" If Greek city-state culture had been poor and sparsely populated, the apparent anomaly would not be of general interest."

How can understand " the apparent anomaly" here?

Discussion

B D Finch Sep 19, 2013:
@axies That is only one of the meanings of "apparent" and not, in my opinion, the one intended here. The word "apparent" here seems to mean something that appears to be the case, but might not actually be so. Though there appears to be an anomaly, there might not be any if one examines the facts in more detail.
axies Sep 19, 2013:
apparent is the word... Anomaly exists in all languages derived from Latin and, in all of these it means the same: _irregularity, discrepancy, peculiarity, oddity and so on.
If one thinks of ''apparent'' as to mean: real, true, visible etc, we have the answer for the translation. The visible/peculiar/odd anomaly
Tina Vonhof (X) Sep 18, 2013:
The first part of the sentence seems wrong to me: the culture is sparsely populated?
B D Finch Sep 18, 2013:
@Charles: me too! You are right, "anomaly" does not mean "contradiction". It is a divergence from what might be expected or a usual pattern.

I hope the Asker and others will note, for any future questions, that enough context should be posted for answerers not to have to research the source text in order to give a sensible answer.
Charles Davis Sep 18, 2013:
I beg to differ "Anomaly" does not mean contradiction; it means something that diverges from the usual pattern, an exception. Greek city-state culture is anomalous because usually early state building is "coercive-intensive", but Greek city-states weren't like that. The fact that they weren't like that is anomalous, exceptional.

The anomaly, then, is the fact they were not coercive-intensive, not the fact that they prospered and lasted. The fact that they did so without being coercive-intensive could be loosely described as a contradiction (an internal inconsistency), but I think it would be better described as a paradox.
Yvonne Gallagher Sep 18, 2013:
Thanks David!

yes, contradiction works well here as the results from the given circumstances are not what would be expected
David Moore (X) Sep 18, 2013:
Contradiction is the word gallagy2 really meant. It's a result the opposite of what you would expect in a given set of circumstances.
Jenni Lukac (X) Sep 18, 2013:
What was the preceding sentence?

Responses

+2
44 mins
Selected

the puzzle

it is explained in the preceding paragraph

the Greek city state was densely populated but the citizens were wealthy and healthy yet

"the governments were not based on strict command and control"

http://books.google.ie/books?id=Jge0MlZTKhQC&pg=PA277&lpg=PA...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 46 mins (2013-09-18 09:52:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

AND

"economies were not based on continual territorial expansion"

Please paste more context as the extract I'm reading won't paste



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 50 mins (2013-09-18 09:56:21 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

The Greek city state is "an historical anomaly the exception that proves the rule" Because it is not built on coercion and expansion (like Rome ort modern European states)

As I say, the preceeding paragraphs explain the anomaly in that the Greek states were different and followed different rules than other city states so that is the "puzzle" or hard -to-explain anomaly

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 50 mins (2013-09-18 09:56:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

preceding

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 53 mins (2013-09-18 09:59:09 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

"we would expect the emergence of expansionist states featuring exploitative systems of patronage, command and control systems..."

but this is not the case here

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 54 mins (2013-09-18 10:00:34 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

yes, as David says, you could also say it's a contradiction here as it is not what is expected in a city state

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs (2013-09-18 12:17:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Charles' "paradox" is another synonym for "contradiction" and "puzzle"

http://thesaurus.com/browse/paradox

and yes, "apparent" = it seems to be (an anomaly) but presumed you knew that already...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 days4 hrs (2013-09-20 13:38:35 GMT) Post-grading
--------------------------------------------------

glad to have helped
Peer comment(s):

agree David Moore (X) : Good refs...
28 mins
Many thanks David:-)
agree Thayenga : :)
2 hrs
many thanks Thayenga:-)
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Thank you for help!"
+2
1 hr

the seeming (but not necessarily actual) divergence from the trend

I am greatly indebted to gallagy for finding the source. This question is impossible to answer without reading the context.

The "anomaly" part is straightforward; as I've said in the discussion and any dictionary will confirm, an anomaly is "something that deviates from what is standard, normal, or expected" (Oxford). The anomaly here is that most early states were "coercive-intensive", expansionist, hierarchical, with an authoritarian and monopolistic power elite, as the author explains in the previous paragraph, but Greek city-states were republican.

But what needs explaining here is "apparent". By the argument just stated, Greece was not an apparent anomaly; it was a real anomaly. So why does he say "apparent"?

If we read on we find the answer. The author argues that from a modern perspective Greek city-states were not actually so exceptional after all. Although they "bucked the trend" in antiquity, there are similar successful city states in late medieval Italy, and in modern times. So he is questioning the premise that the pattern of state-building compared with which ancient Greek states are anomalous is actually the norm:

"When exceptions begin to multiply, the rule must be rethought. If we take the contemporary world of nation-states as normative, the centrally controlled empires of antiquity, with their "expand or collapse" state-building dynamic, may come to seem less overwhelming in the relative analytic importance" (following page).

This idea is central to the book, or at least to this part of the book, because the idea of the modernity of ancient Greek states is what the author is trying to argue.



--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2013-09-18 11:44:19 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

So another way of paraphrasing "the apparent analogy might be "the case which seems to be an exception to the rule but turns out not to be so exceptional after all".
Peer comment(s):

agree B D Finch : Well analysed!
2 hrs
Thanks very much, B D!
agree Tina Vonhof (X)
4 hrs
Thank you, Tina!
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search