Glossary entry

French term or phrase:

pour les besoins exclusifs de la Compagnie

English translation:

exclusively for the Company\'s needs

Added to glossary by Wyley Powell
Mar 17, 2019 22:04
5 yrs ago
French term

pour les besoins exclusifs de la Compagnie

Non-PRO French to English Bus/Financial Human Resources Collective Agreement (Quebec)
This appears in the Seniority section of the collective agreement.

"Lorsqu'un employé est choisi suite à un affichage de tâche et qu'il ne peut débuter dans la nouvelle tâche ***pour les besoins exclusifs de la Compagnie***, il est considéré comme ayant été rétrogradé de cette nouvelle tâche pour les fins d'application des dispositions prévues au paragraphe XX ("Vacance permanente"), s'il n'a pas travaillé dans la nouvelle tâche pourvu qu'entre-temps il n'ait pas été promu ou rappelé à une autre tâche."

A literal transaltion of "pour les besoins exclusifs de la Compagnie" strikes me as odd. I wonder whether this means "is unable to begin the new job on a full-time basis". Thx.
Change log

Mar 23, 2019 11:24: Rob Grayson changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

PRO (1): Daryo

Non-PRO (3): GILLES MEUNIER, Rachel Fell, Rob Grayson

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Discussion

Daryo Mar 18, 2019:
@ Wyley Powell strictly speaking this is not about "a new job":

"un employé est choisi suite à un affichage de tâche" => it's about internal redeployment of an existing employee

it's a continuation of existing employment while being affected to a new/different position, to different tasks.

If you want to know why they felt the need to specify "pour les besoins exclusifs de la Compagnie" (and would be the "opposite" to that) you can always check with Le Syndicat des Métallos - Local 6254, but the meaning is unambiguous.

OTOH, I would definitely agree that when translating, you should always keep in mind that the text must make sense - for the intended audience. So if anything sounds strange to you, check with the authors.

Proposed translations

12 hrs
Selected

exclusively for the Company's needs

that's what the ST says, and I don't see why there would be any need to start twisting the neck to the meaning of the text.

This being "UNE CONVENTION COLLECTIVE" i.e. a kind of document that must have been checked and rechecked by all parties involved, any kind of typo or nonsense is extremely unlikely.

A reasonable hypothesis would be that the point of this clause is to prevent the employer from sending the employee to work for another Company (while still being on their payroll). Whatever is the rationale of this clause, the intended meaning is unambiguous.
Peer comment(s):

neutral Andrew Bramhall : literal doesn't fit here;
12 hrs
It obviously makes sense for those who negotiated this "Convention collective" // you know their business better than them?
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
-1
1 hr

exclusively on the company's terms

regardless of the employee's own self-imposed restrictions or limitations he/she may have brought to bear;

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr (2019-03-17 23:15:04 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

You're right that the literal translation makes little sense here;
Peer comment(s):

disagree Daryo : this makes even less sense: WHERE is the distinctive element (the significant difference from other situations)???? An employee is ALWAYS supposed to act "on company's terms" - that being the very nature of "employment".
10 hrs
Whatever; whoever works exclusively for a company always does so on their terms, not their own;
Something went wrong...

Reference comments

1 hr
Reference:

Document found on line

It seems that the document can be found at http://cfcanada.fticonsulting.com/bloomlake/docs/Exhibit R-1...
The paragraph you are working on appears at page 10. The phrase in question appears again (twice) at page 16. The context of the two latter cases suggest that "pour les besoins exclusifs de la compagnie" means something like "for reasons due exclusively to the company". This meaning is less obvious in the case you are dealing with (page 10 of the online version.
Note from asker:
Thanks. This is the very document that I am translating.
Peer comments on this reference comment:

agree Daryo : definitely helps to have a wider context.
10 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search