Why am I only seeing 2 pages of forums? Thread poster: Tom in London
|
Tom in London United Kingdom Local time: 14:18 Member (2008) Italian to English
I must be doing something wrong. When I go to the discussion forums (where I see all the topics I've selected to follow) I only get 2 pages. How do I move on to page 3, page 4, etc.? | | |
I see the same! | Sep 12, 2015 |
Page 1 says 1, 2, next, and then it ends (suddenly) on page 2! Has it always been like this? I'm not sure... | | |
I have just noticed another hitch! | Sep 12, 2015 |
All translation jobs are Spanish to English... | | |
This has been on the to-do list since quite a bit of years | Sep 12, 2015 |
and there have been several discussions about this. Improvements were promised but then this issue must have fallen into oblivion.![](https://cfcdn.proz.com/images/bb/smiles/icon_mad.gif) | |
|
|
Tom in London United Kingdom Local time: 14:18 Member (2008) Italian to English TOPIC STARTER |
Samuel Murray Netherlands Local time: 15:18 Member (2006) English to Afrikaans + ... You can see only 2 pages of "recent" posts | Sep 12, 2015 |
Tom in London wrote:
When I go to the discussion forums (where I see all the topics I've selected to follow) I only get 2 pages. How do I move on to page 3, page 4, etc.?
If you're looking at the category "most recent posts", you can see only two pages. However, if you visit the subforums' pages individually, then you can see all posts (or at least dozens of pages). | | |
[Bearbeitet am 2015-09-13 08:07 GMT] | | |
Tom in London United Kingdom Local time: 14:18 Member (2008) Italian to English TOPIC STARTER
Samuel Murray wrote:
Tom in London wrote:
When I go to the discussion forums (where I see all the topics I've selected to follow) I only get 2 pages. How do I move on to page 3, page 4, etc.?
If you're looking at the category "most recent posts", you can see only two pages. However, if you visit the subforums' pages individually, then you can see all posts (or at least dozens of pages).
Thanks Samuel, but what I would like to be able to do is see multiple pages of *all* the forums to which I am subscribed. | |
|
|
Tom in London United Kingdom Local time: 14:18 Member (2008) Italian to English TOPIC STARTER
Has there been any progress with this? | | |
I still have only two pages ( | | |
Tom in London United Kingdom Local time: 14:18 Member (2008) Italian to English TOPIC STARTER Too many virtual conferences | Sep 30, 2016 |
Viviane Marx wrote:
I still have only two pages ![](https://cfcdn.proz.com/images/bb/smiles/icon_frown.gif) (
And now all these virtual conference notifications are pushing everything else out of sight.
Is there something users can do so that we see ALL pages of discussions and not just the most recent TWO? | | |
Just click a few more buttons! | Sep 30, 2016 |
Tom in London wrote:
Viviane Marx wrote:
I still have only two pages ![](https://cfcdn.proz.com/images/bb/smiles/icon_frown.gif) (
And now all these virtual conference notifications are pushing everything else out of sight.
Is there something users can do so that we see ALL pages of discussions and not just the most recent TWO?
Sorry Tom, please read the thread of Samuel again. If this is the level we are going to, it is sad!
[Edited at 2016-09-30 21:54 GMT]
[Edited at 2016-09-30 21:56 GMT] | |
|
|
Tom in London United Kingdom Local time: 14:18 Member (2008) Italian to English TOPIC STARTER I don't understand | Oct 1, 2016 |
I don't understand the statement "if you visit the subforums' pages individually". My point is that I want to see multiple pages right here, not just two. I used to be able to do that, but not now. | | |
CafeTran Training (X) Netherlands Local time: 15:18 Perhaps there is a technical reason | Oct 1, 2016 |
Tom in London wrote:
I don't understand the statement "if you visit the subforums' pages individually". My point is that I want to see multiple pages right here, not just two. I used to be able to do that, but not now.
Perhaps there is a technical reason, but if not, it'd be nice to be able to go back in time endlessly. I agree with you on this, Tom. | | |